Radtel’s RT‑860 and RT‑880 are powerful options for amateur and CB radio users, offering wide frequency coverage and a host of handy features. While they share a lot in common, key differences like display, receive performance, and additional capabilities make each suited to different use cases.
Product Overview
Radtel RT-860
- Covers HF/VHF/UHF, with capability for AM, USB, LSB, CW, CB, LW, MW, SW, and SSB reception.
- Built-in air-band receiver and NOAA weather channels.
- Compact design with Type‑C charging and a robust, metal-bodied build.
Radtel RT-880
- Also supports extensive multi-band reception, plus exclusive extras like cross-band relay/repeater, 2.4-inch color display, and real-time field strength meter.
- Larger 2400 mAh battery and interface enhancements.
Comparison Table
Feature | Radtel RT-860 | Radtel RT-880 |
---|---|---|
Frequency Coverage | HF/VHF/UHF, AM/USB/LSB/CW/CB/LW/MW/SW/SSB | Similar wide coverage + cross-band functionality |
Display | Standard monochrome LCD | Larger 2.4″ color display, clearer UI |
Cross-Band Relay | No | Yes — repeat signals across bands |
Real-Time Signal Meter | No | Yes — shows field strength numerically |
Battery Capacity | ~2000 mAh | 2400 mAh — longer runtime |
Charging Port | Type-C | Type‑C — fast charging |
Antenna Compatibility | Only stock antenna guaranteed | Same caution applies — stock recommended |
Build & Durability | Tough metal body | Similar rugged build |
Price & Community Adoption | More widely known and supported | Newer model with advanced features but less online presence |
HF Reception Enhancement | Good HF receive | Improved HF receive over RT‑860 — users report stronger audio and sensitivity |
Pros & Cons
Radtel RT-860
Pros:
- Broad band coverage (including AM/FM/SW/air band)
- Compact, durable design with Type‑C charging
- Established community and accessory support
Cons:
- Basic monochrome display
- No cross-band or real-time signal metering
- Only stock antenna reliably works
Radtel RT-880
Pros:
- Bright color display for easier navigation
- Cross-band relay/repeater capability
- Real-time field strength feedback
- Larger battery, longer use time
- Improved HF receive performance reported by users
Cons:
- Slightly higher price
- Newer with smaller user base
- Same antenna compatibility limitations
Final Thoughts
- Choose the RT-860 if you prefer a proven, rugged radio with comprehensive band versatility and solid community support.
- Opt for the RT-880 if you want enhanced usability, cross-band features, and visual display upgrades that make operating more intuitive and flexible.